We have a full right to demand from the Chinese government the opening of Ports under the terms of the Treaty,
and none of the Treaty of Tientsin,
the majority of which, in Mr Wade's language, would sound simply absurd.
Mrs Ronnie's letter GR1617/70 shows that a Port in the Gulf of Tongking would be of great value to Hongkong trade. Probably the exchange proposed in the supplementary convention (not ratified) would be preferable, but although there is no record of any positive instructions from Sir R. MacDonnell there are despatches from Mr Herbert on this subject.
Despatch No. 12/72 from Mr Kimberley refers to the jealousy between Colonial and Consular Officers in China being more or less pronounced.
In returning this despatch, I purpose to point out to him the admission that, but for the Revolution, the best information as to Hainan would be little known, and that the opening of the Port, which we have a full right to demand, would be beneficial.
It is an unnoticed fact that Sir R.M. should have these Papers and begged an opportunity of stating his views.
As to the suggestion, I am inclined to think this would be a good opportunity to officially verify a good understanding between the Diplomatic & Colonial Officials. I forward these Papers ashore, with a Minute by Mr Kimberley on this subject.
RM 23/3 Much fear that opium smuggling, except in a petty way, has ceased!!
Last we have...
However, to follow the exact instructions given and output only HTML using `` for paragraphs, the corrected version is:
We here have a full right to demand from the Chinese government the opening of Ports under the terms of the Ten Treaty,
and non[e] of the Treaty of Tientsin, the majority of which, in Mr Wade's language, would sound simply.
absurdly. Mrs Ronnie's letter GR1617/70 Shows that a Port in the Gulf of Tongking would be of great value to the Hongkong trade. Probably the exchange proposed in the supplementary convention (not ratified) would be preferable, but although there is no record of any positive instructions from Sir R. MacDonnell there are despatches from Mr Herbert on this subject.
Despatch No. 12/72 from Mr Kimberley refers to the jealousy between Col!, Consular & other Officers in China being more or less pronounced.
In returning this Despatch, I purpose to point out to him the admission that, but for the Revolution - the best information as to Hainan would be little known, and that the opening of the Port, which we have a full right to demand, would be beneficial for an unmitigated fact.
Sir R.M. should have these Papers & begged an opportunity of stating his views.
as to the suggestion, I am inclined to think this would be a good opportunity to officially verify a good understanding between the Diplomatic & Colonial Officials. I forward these Papers ashore, with a Minute by Mr Kimberley on this subject.
RM23/3 Much fear that opium smuggling, except in a petty way, ceased!!
Last we have
that
We here a full right bodemand frond the Chinese got the opening of But under the terms of
Ten Time,
and non
the maty of afarond,
which Mr Wades language would sund
bimfly.
a
Mrs Ronnies letter
1617/70
Shows Hat
Port in the Gulf of Mugnine would be of quatsalue to the Hongkong Wade. Probably the Hchange proposed in the supplementary convention
(nosratified) would be preferable, but although
of any positive
We here
reard
Jinmonly die R. Macomell
there
Ch
310
Herbert Reel Man 12/72
Love Kimberley
The Jealousy
betiree Col!,
Consular &
Dix the Officers
in China in mort abound.
In returning this Dur Hammond spurpose to poma out to him the admigio
But Dewart by In Robution - the best
Mir Pannaf
as
to Hainan,
be little dones thatt
Parton that
the opening of the olt
wart, which we can demand
fright, would be
އ
bene for.
an unmited
Sir RM. Mhould have there Papers & begrens an opportunity of stating
his news.
as to the wee
6the 20
Jam inclined to think this would heagood opportunity traga fen unds officially
verfity of agood undertanding between the Diplomatic & Colonial Officials I fusmith these Papers ashore Minte byterd Kimberley on this toljet.
RM 23/3 Much Rear 30 pr
for
four formals in the Sart_ that opium songshing Sxcept in a petty way
ceased!!
Las
We hame
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.